Hi James,
>> Unfortunately, the patch broke the test on sparc:
>>
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-34.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump slp2
>> "basic block vectorized"
>> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-34.c scan-tree-dump slp2 "basic block vectorized"
>>
>> While before the scan-tree-dump wasn't ru
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:53:02PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Richard Biener writes:
>
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> ARM and AArch64 will still vectorize bb-slp-34.c - we're not operating
> >> with a cost model so we vectorize to a 64-bit vector of
Richard Biener writes:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ARM and AArch64 will still vectorize bb-slp-34.c - we're not operating
>> with a cost model so we vectorize to a 64-bit vector of two ints, and the
>> permutes are just element swaps.
>>
>> So, don't mark th
On Thu, 3 Mar 2016, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> ARM and AArch64 will still vectorize bb-slp-34.c - we're not operating
> with a cost model so we vectorize to a 64-bit vector of two ints, and the
> permutes are just element swaps.
>
> So, don't mark this test xfail for arm/aarch64.
>
>
Hi,
ARM and AArch64 will still vectorize bb-slp-34.c - we're not operating
with a cost model so we vectorize to a 64-bit vector of two ints, and the
permutes are just element swaps.
So, don't mark this test xfail for arm/aarch64.
Checked on x86_64-none-linux-gnu, arm-none-eabi and aarch64-none-
