On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:22 PM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 13:11 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:21 PM, William J. Schmidt
>> wrote:
>> > Pro forma ping. :)
>>
>> ;)
>>
>> I notice (with all of these functions)
>>
>> +unsigned
>> +negate_cost (e
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 11:52 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 06/20/2012 04:11 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> > I notice (with all of these functions)
> >
> > +unsigned
> > +negate_cost (enum machine_mode mode, bool speed)
> > +{
> > + static unsigned costs[NUM_MACHINE_MODES];
> > + rtx seq;
>
On 06/20/2012 04:11 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> I notice (with all of these functions)
>
> +unsigned
> +negate_cost (enum machine_mode mode, bool speed)
> +{
> + static unsigned costs[NUM_MACHINE_MODES];
> + rtx seq;
> + unsigned cost;
> +
> + if (costs[mode])
> +return costs[mode];
> +
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 13:11 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:21 PM, William J. Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Pro forma ping. :)
>
> ;)
>
> I notice (with all of these functions)
>
> +unsigned
> +negate_cost (enum machine_mode mode, bool speed)
> +{
> + static unsigned costs[NU
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 3:21 PM, William J. Schmidt
wrote:
> Pro forma ping. :)
;)
I notice (with all of these functions)
+unsigned
+negate_cost (enum machine_mode mode, bool speed)
+{
+ static unsigned costs[NUM_MACHINE_MODES];
+ rtx seq;
+ unsigned cost;
+
+ if (costs[mode])
+return c
Pro forma ping. :)
Thanks,
Bill
On Sun, 2012-04-29 at 18:17 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote:
> Thought I'd ping http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg01225.html
> since it's been about six weeks. Any initial feedback would be very
> much appreciated!
>
> Thanks,
> Bill
Thought I'd ping http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg01225.html
since it's been about six weeks. Any initial feedback would be very
much appreciated!
Thanks,
Bill
