Re: [Patch docs 2/5] Update "Instruction Patterns" in md.texi

2015-01-12 Thread Richard Sandiford
James Greenhalgh writes: > @node Example > @section Example of @code{define_insn} > @cindex @code{define_insn} example > > -Here is an actual example of an instruction pattern, for the 68000/68020. > +Here is an example of an instruction pattern, taken from the machine > +description for the

Re: [Patch docs 2/5] Update "Instruction Patterns" in md.texi

2015-01-11 Thread James Greenhalgh
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 10:00:02PM +, Jeff Law wrote: > On 01/06/15 04:21, James Greenhalgh wrote: > If I havne't commented, then those hunks should be considered OK -- you > can check those hunks in if you want. Thanks Jeff, I've committed the attached as revision 219432. I'll work on respi

Re: [Patch docs 2/5] Update "Instruction Patterns" in md.texi

2015-01-08 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 03:00:02PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 01/06/15 04:21, James Greenhalgh wrote: > >-A @code{define_insn} is an RTL expression containing four or five > >operands: > >+A @code{define_insn} contains either four or five components: > How about > A @code{define_insn} contains th

Re: [Patch docs 2/5] Update "Instruction Patterns" in md.texi

2015-01-08 Thread Jeff Law
On 01/06/15 04:21, James Greenhalgh wrote: Hi, This patch updates the second section of md.texi - "Everything about Patterns". I was aiming to: * Remove outdated details of the compiler. * Remove long or obscure words that, while accurate, only served to obfuscate a simple idea.

[Patch docs 2/5] Update "Instruction Patterns" in md.texi

2015-01-06 Thread James Greenhalgh
Hi, This patch updates the second section of md.texi - "Everything about Patterns". I was aiming to: * Remove outdated details of the compiler. * Remove long or obscure words that, while accurate, only served to obfuscate a simple idea. * Refer to similar things in a consistent fashio