Re: [Patch RFA libitm] config-based assessment of weakref capability

2011-11-18 Thread Iain Sandoe
On 18 Nov 2011, at 16:17, Jack Howarth wrote: For gcc trunk at r181476 with 181473-libitm-config-weakref.txt, 181473-libitm-tests-mapanon.txt and 181473-libitm-user-label-prefix.txt as well as the regenerations performed in libitm, I see the following failures on x86_64-apple-darwin11 unde

Re: [Patch RFA libitm] config-based assessment of weakref capability

2011-11-18 Thread Jack Howarth
Iain, For gcc trunk at r181476 with 181473-libitm-config-weakref.txt, 181473-libitm-tests-mapanon.txt and 181473-libitm-user-label-prefix.txt as well as the regenerations performed in libitm, I see the following failures on x86_64-apple-darwin11 under Xcode 4.2... Running target unix/-m32 Usi

Re: [Patch RFA libitm] config-based assessment of weakref capability

2011-11-18 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Rainer, On 18 Nov 2011, at 14:49, Rainer Orth wrote: I hope it also works for Rainer and that I've got the right designator for the Tru64 cross-case. I guess it does, given that the testcase is based on my own one :-) so long as my wrapping it in m4 hasn't broken the intent .. ;-

Re: [Patch RFA libitm] config-based assessment of weakref capability

2011-11-18 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 02:43:58PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote: > > On 18 Nov 2011, at 14:40, Jack Howarth wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 01:44:40PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> one of the three remaining libitm issues for Darwin is to supply the >>> dummy funcs fro the weakrefs (as

Re: [Patch RFA libitm] config-based assessment of weakref capability

2011-11-18 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Iain, > one of the three remaining libitm issues for Darwin is to supply the dummy > funcs fro the weakrefs (as Rainer has done for Tru64) for the versions of > Darwin that need them. > > Since we now have the situation where there are several targets which might > need dummy functions for the

Re: [Patch RFA libitm] config-based assessment of weakref capability

2011-11-18 Thread Iain Sandoe
On 18 Nov 2011, at 14:40, Jack Howarth wrote: On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 01:44:40PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote: Hi, one of the three remaining libitm issues for Darwin is to supply the dummy funcs fro the weakrefs (as Rainer has done for Tru64) for the versions of Darwin that need them. Since we

Re: [Patch RFA libitm] config-based assessment of weakref capability

2011-11-18 Thread Jack Howarth
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 01:44:40PM +, Iain Sandoe wrote: > Hi, > > one of the three remaining libitm issues for Darwin is to supply the > dummy funcs fro the weakrefs (as Rainer has done for Tru64) for the > versions of Darwin that need them. > > Since we now have the situation where there

[Patch RFA libitm] config-based assessment of weakref capability

2011-11-18 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi, one of the three remaining libitm issues for Darwin is to supply the dummy funcs fro the weakrefs (as Rainer has done for Tru64) for the versions of Darwin that need them. Since we now have the situation where there are several targets which might need dummy functions for the weak dec