On 02/11/15 14:38, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 2 November 2015 at 15:20, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 27 May 2015 at 22:15, Christophe Lyon wrote:
* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vtbX.c: Likewise.
Noticed this testcase failed on big-endian on my local test
gcc.target/aarch64/a
On 2 November 2015 at 15:20, Jiong Wang wrote:
> On 27 May 2015 at 22:15, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>>
>>> * gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vtbX.c: Likewise.
>>>
>
> Noticed this testcase failed on big-endian on my local test
>
> gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vtbX.c line 1
On 27 May 2015 at 22:15, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
* gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vtbX.c: Likewise.
Noticed this testcase failed on big-endian on my local test
gcc.target/aarch64/advsimd-intrinsics/vtbX.c line 188 in buffer
'expected_vtbl3') at type int8x8 index 0: got 0x0
On 16 June 2015 at 12:08, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:11:16PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> Ping?
>>
>>
>> On 27 May 2015 at 22:15, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> > This patch series is a follow-up to the tests I already contributed,
>> > converted from my original testsuit
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:11:16PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Ping?
>
>
> On 27 May 2015 at 22:15, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > This patch series is a follow-up to the tests I already contributed,
> > converted from my original testsuite.
> >
> > This series consists in 20 new patches, which
Ping?
On 27 May 2015 at 22:15, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> This patch series is a follow-up to the tests I already contributed,
> converted from my original testsuite.
>
> This series consists in 20 new patches, which can be committed
> independently. For vrecpe, I added the setting of the "Flush-t
This patch series is a follow-up to the tests I already contributed,
converted from my original testsuite.
This series consists in 20 new patches, which can be committed
independently. For vrecpe, I added the setting of the "Flush-to-Zero"
FP flag, to force AArch64 to behave the same as ARM by def
