On 17 May 2016 at 12:02, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
>> On 17 May 2016 at 10:06, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > This is just a simplification, it probably makes life easier for register
>> > allocation in some corner
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> On 17 May 2016 at 10:06, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is just a simplification, it probably makes life easier for register
> > allocation in some corner cases and seems the right thing to do. We don't
> > use t
On 17 May 2016 at 10:06, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is just a simplification, it probably makes life easier for register
> allocation in some corner cases and seems the right thing to do. We don't
> use the internal version elsewhere, so we're safe to delete it and change
> the types
Hi,
This is just a simplification, it probably makes life easier for register
allocation in some corner cases and seems the right thing to do. We don't
use the internal version elsewhere, so we're safe to delete it and change
the types.
OK?
Bootstrapped on AArch64 with no issues.
Thanks,
James
