On 10/19/20 10:03 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge and Joseph convinced me that 'rootme' only makes sense
> for in-tree testing and, hence, does not need (or: should not) be set in
> site.exp.
>
> Thus, if it is not set, we have to check its existence before using it –
> to avoid simila
TCL errors when
ASAN/TSAN/UBSAN is not available)
Thomas Schwinge and Joseph convinced me that 'rootme' only makes sense for
in-tree testing and, hence, does not need (or: should not) be set in site.exp.
Thus, if it is not set, we have to check its existence before using it - to
avoid s
Thomas Schwinge and Joseph convinced me that 'rootme' only makes sense
for in-tree testing and, hence, does not need (or: should not) be set in
site.exp.
Thus, if it is not set, we have to check its existence before using it –
to avoid similar TCL errors.
Hence, I updated the patch to check also
In a --disable-libsanitizer build, I see errors such as:
g++.sum:ERROR: can't read "asan_saved_library_path": no such variable
I believe the following patch is the right way to solve this.
OK?
Tobias
-
Mentor Graphics (Deutschland) GmbH, Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München / Germa