On 2/28/23 00:23, Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 2/28/23 02:10, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023, Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches wrote:
Patch OK for master branch? I did not see any obvious issues to
exclude LLP64
specifically.
I see "lp64 || lp64" in that patch (whi
On 2/28/23 02:10, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023, Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches wrote:
Patch OK for master branch? I did not see any obvious issues to exclude LLP64
specifically.
I see "lp64 || lp64" in that patch (which should preferably have
been sent inline, as it's harder t
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023, Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Patch OK for master branch? I did not see any obvious issues to exclude LLP64
> specifically.
I see "lp64 || lp64" in that patch (which should preferably have
been sent inline, as it's harder to quote an attached patch,
QED). Sending
Patch OK for master branch? I did not see any obvious issues to exclude
LLP64 specifically.From 9c770936c4c6ffb59d15e5c1ce331494ba102250 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 06:34:04 +
Subject: [PATCH] gcc.c-torture/compile/103818.c:
