On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 09:36:05AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 08:31:02AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > > Hmm, there were now two daily bumps: [...] I really wonder why.
> > Because I've done it by hand.
>
> Okay, that explains it.
>
> I still
Hi Jakub,
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 08:31:02AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hmm, there were now two daily bumps: [...] I really wonder why.
Because I've done it by hand.
Okay, that explains it.
I still do not understand why it slipped through at the first place; I
tried o
27;t (I think sometimes it needs the hash of the revert
commit, at other times the commit hash referenced in the revert commit)
or that further ones are needed.
> From f56b1764f2b5c2c83c6852607405e5be0a763a2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Tobias Burnus
> Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 08:17
the check scripts? Does
it ignore the errors? Or what goes wrong here? Any idea?
TobiasFrom f56b1764f2b5c2c83c6852607405e5be0a763a2c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tobias Burnus
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 08:17:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] contrib/gcc-changelog/git_update_version.py: Improve diagnostic
