Re: [Patch] Remove _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF from (was Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon)

2012-10-31 Thread JonY
On 10/31/2012 20:01, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 31 October 2012 11:23, JonY wrote: >> On 10/31/2012 19:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> >>> It looks like the workaround is in mingw not in GCC, so is it a >>> problem that it won't be possible to use GCC 4.8 with existing mingw >>> versions, or are us

Re: [Patch] Remove _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF from (was Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon)

2012-10-31 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 31 October 2012 11:23, JonY wrote: > On 10/31/2012 19:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> It looks like the workaround is in mingw not in GCC, so is it a >> problem that it won't be possible to use GCC 4.8 with existing mingw >> versions, or are users required to use a brand new mingw to use a new

Re: [Patch] Remove _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF from (was Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon)

2012-10-31 Thread Paolo Carlini
Applied. Thanks, Paolo.

Re: [Patch] Remove _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF from (was Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon)

2012-10-31 Thread JonY
On 10/31/2012 19:23, JonY wrote: > >> Why is the define commented out by the patch, not simply removed? >> If it's not needed then it's not needed. We have subversion to track >> change history, we don't need to leave dead code lying around with >> comments explaining why it's dead. > > OK, I wil

Re: [Patch] Remove _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF from (was Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon)

2012-10-31 Thread JonY
tly after the freeze, may >>>> still go in, further changes should be just bugfixes and documentation >>>> fixes. >>>> >>> >>> Somebody with commit rights please push "[Patch] Remove >>> _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF from mingw32-w64/os_

[Patch] Remove _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF from (was Re: GCC 4.8.0 Status Report (2012-10-29), Stage 1 to end soon)

2012-10-31 Thread Jonathan Wakely
, November 5th. If you have still patches for new features you'd >>> like to see in GCC 4.8, please post them for review soon. Patches >>> posted before the freeze, but reviewed shortly after the freeze, may >>> still go in, further changes should be just bugfixes and

Re: [Patch] Remove _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF from mingw32-w64/os_defines.h

2012-10-30 Thread JonY
On 10/29/2012 21:05, JonY wrote: >> ChangeLog >> 2012-10-29 Jonathan Yong >> >> * config/os/mingw32-w64/os_defines.h: Remove >> _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF >> as no longer required. >> >> >> >> Index: libstdc++-v3/config/os/mingw32-w64/os_defines.h >> ==

Re: [Patch] Remove _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF from mingw32-w64/os_defines.h

2012-10-29 Thread JonY
Fix the mail subject line. On 10/29/2012 06:56, JonY wrote: > Hi, > > Workaround now exists for trunk mingw-w64 headers. > Kai approved over IRC, so anybody with commit rights please push. > > ChangeLog > 2012-10-29 Jonathan Yong > > * config/os/mingw32-w64/os_defines.h: Remove > _GLI

[Patch] Remove _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF from

2012-10-28 Thread JonY
Hi, Workaround now exists for trunk mingw-w64 headers. Kai approved over IRC, so anybody with commit rights please push. ChangeLog 2012-10-29 Jonathan Yong * config/os/mingw32-w64/os_defines.h: Remove _GLIBCXX_HAVE_BROKEN_VSWPRINTF as no longer required. Index: libstdc++-v