On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 07:00:18PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Though, I wonder if we shouldn't for GCC 13 just sorry_at about
> steps other than constant 1/-1 (in both outer loop with var-outer referenced
> in inner loop and on inner loop that references it) and for the !VAR_P ca
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 06:39:04PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > + The issue is that for those a 'count' variable is used. */
> > +dovar_init *di;
> > +unsigned ix;
> > +tree t = tree_var;
> > +while (TREE_CODE (t) == INDIRECT_REF)
> > + t = TREE_OPERAN
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 03:40:19PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> + gfc_symbol *var = code->ext.iterator->var->symtree->n.sym;
> +
> + gfc_se se;
> + tree tree_var, a1, a2;
> + a1 = integer_one_node;
> + a2 = integer_zero_node;
> +
> + gfc_init_se (&se, NULL);
> + gfc_conv_expr_lhs (&se, code
This is all about non-rectangular loop nests in OpenMP.
The attached patch depends on the obvious fix for https://gcc.gnu.org/PR108459,
which is together with a nice testcase in Jakub's WIP patch attached to the PR;
without, gfortran.dg/gomp/canonical-loop-1.f90 fails with an ICE (segfault).
My
