Hi Jakub,
On 30.09.22 13:04, Jakub Jelinek via Fortran wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 12:41:19PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
And 'device(omp_initial_device)' printed a warning in Fortran.
(BTW: C/C++ silently accepts any negative value.)
I think that is what the standard wants.
E.g. in 5.2 d
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 12:41:19PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> While has_device_addr has been implemented (in GCC 12), updating
> use_device_ptr for Fortran was missed.
>
> This patch fixes it: Removing the restrictions and mapping to
> has_device_addr where applicable.
>
> For use_device_ptr s
On 30.09.22 12:41, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Fortran: Update use_device_ptr for OpenMP 5.1 [PR105318]
The following two lines slipped in – which I have now removed in my version of
the patch:
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr-1.f90
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/gomp/is_device_ptr
While has_device_addr has been implemented (in GCC 12), updating
use_device_ptr for Fortran was missed.
This patch fixes it: Removing the restrictions and mapping to
has_device_addr where applicable.
For use_device_ptr something similar was done, albeit I think
this has no semantic effect.
And
