On Wed, 4 Sep 2013, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
> Reattaching the patch with a testcase for the AVR target. I'm not sure
> how to generalize the testcase for other targets - the constant is the
> max value (unsigned) of the mode used to represent initialized array
> indices.
Logically that shou
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 09:49:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Selvaraj, Senthil_Kumar wrote:
>
> > 2013-08-23 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> > * c-typeck.c (output_pending_init_elements): Handle overflow of
> > constructor_unfilled_index.
>
> This patch needs to add
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Selvaraj, Senthil_Kumar wrote:
> 2013-08-23 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> * c-typeck.c (output_pending_init_elements): Handle overflow of
> constructor_unfilled_index.
This patch needs to add include a testcase to the testsuite that fails
before and passes after th
Hi,
This line of code causes gcc for the AVR target to loop
for a while and eventually crash after exhausting virtual memory.
char x[] = { [0xFF] = 2 };
output_pending_init_elements in gcc/c/c-typeck.c ends up in an
infinite loop if elt->purpose is a tree representing an integer
const
