On 10/29/19 10:26 AM, Miguel Saldivar wrote:
> There seems to be a small issue with the commit, somehow "float _Complex"
> turned into "Complex"
> within "demangle-expected", so the test now fails. Attached will be a fix
> for it. Thank you for committing
> the fix though.
patch is complaining that
There seems to be a small issue with the commit, somehow "float _Complex"
turned into "Complex"
within "demangle-expected", so the test now fails. Attached will be a fix
for it. Thank you for committing
the fix though.
Miguel
>From 7eb6afb42ff1ce1c22f0fce167c3fb593d316abb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
On 10/19/19 10:35 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 9:11 PM Miguel Saldivar
> wrote:
>>
>> Updated patch that uses `_Complex` and `_Imaginary`
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Miguel Saldivar
>>
>> From 742b37c88bea0118046ac359cabe5f250d69ee30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Miguel Saldivar
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 9:11 PM Miguel Saldivar wrote:
>
> Updated patch that uses `_Complex` and `_Imaginary`
>
> Thanks,
> Miguel Saldivar
>
> From 742b37c88bea0118046ac359cabe5f250d69ee30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Miguel Saldivar
> Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 21:06:07 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH
Updated patch that uses `_Complex` and `_Imaginary`
Thanks,
Miguel Saldivar
>From 742b37c88bea0118046ac359cabe5f250d69ee30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miguel Saldivar
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2019 21:06:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix for complex and imaginary values
gcc/libiberty/
* cp-demangle.c (d
The only reason I wanted `float complex` was for interoperability
between the two other demanglers. Although the go demangler
does use `_Complex` and `_Imaginary`, so I guess it's sort of split.
But I agree, `_Complex` and `_Imaginary` is probably the
better option.
Thanks,
Miguel Saldivar
On Fr
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 10:20 PM Miguel Saldivar wrote:
>
> This is a small fix for Bug 67299, where symbol: `Z1fCf` which would become
> `f(float complex)` instead of `f(floatcomplex )`.
> I thought this would be the preferred way of printing, because both
> `llvm-cxxfilt` and `cpp_filt` both pri
This is a small fix for Bug 67299, where symbol: `Z1fCf` which would become
`f(float complex)` instead of `f(floatcomplex )`.
I thought this would be the preferred way of printing, because both
`llvm-cxxfilt` and `cpp_filt` both print the the mangled name in this
fashion.
Thanks,
Miguel Saldivar
