On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 10:11:51AM +0100, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I have addressed the issues below.
>
> OK for trunk?
This looks good to me, thanks for the patch.
I've committed this to trunk on your behalf as revision 250202.
Thanks,
James
Hi James,
I have addressed the issues below.
OK for trunk?
Jackson
On 07/13/2017 05:14 PM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 04:35:55PM +0100, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi James,
I've addressed the issues discussed below.
OK for trunk?
I one last comment, otherwise, this looks
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 04:35:55PM +0100, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> I've addressed the issues discussed below.
>
> OK for trunk?
I one last comment, otherwise, this looks good:
> +/* Print operand X to file F in a target specific manner according to CODE.
> + The acceptable form
Hi James,
I've addressed the issues discussed below.
OK for trunk?
Jackson
On 07/13/2017 10:03 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 05:29:11PM +0100, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
Hi all,
This patch refactors comments in config/aarch64/aarch64.c
aarch64_print_operand
to provide a t
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 05:29:11PM +0100, Jackson Woodruff wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This patch refactors comments in config/aarch64/aarch64.c
> aarch64_print_operand
> to provide a table of aarch64 specific formating options.
>
> I've tested the patch with a bootstrap and testsuite run on aarch64.
>
Hi all,
This patch refactors comments in config/aarch64/aarch64.c
aarch64_print_operand
to provide a table of aarch64 specific formating options.
I've tested the patch with a bootstrap and testsuite run on aarch64.
OK for trunk?
Changelog:
gcc/
2017-07-04 Jackson Woodruff
* config
