Re: [Patch][ARM] backport r266665 to gcc8

2019-11-15 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 15:27, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 14/11/2019 08:40, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is it OK to backport r25 to gcc8 (Ensure dotproduct is only > > enabled on armv8 neon) ? > > I've noticed unnecessary failure of gcc.target/arm/simd/vdot-compile.c > >

Re: [Patch][ARM] backport r266665 to gcc8

2019-11-15 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists)
On 14/11/2019 08:40, Christophe Lyon wrote: Hi, Is it OK to backport r25 to gcc8 (Ensure dotproduct is only enabled on armv8 neon) ? I've noticed unnecessary failure of gcc.target/arm/simd/vdot-compile.c after I upgraded to recent binutils. Thanks, Christophe Is there a PR for this? R.

[Patch][ARM] backport r266665 to gcc8

2019-11-14 Thread Christophe Lyon
Hi, Is it OK to backport r25 to gcc8 (Ensure dotproduct is only enabled on armv8 neon) ? I've noticed unnecessary failure of gcc.target/arm/simd/vdot-compile.c after I upgraded to recent binutils. Thanks, Christophe [ARM] Ensure dotproduct is only enabled on armv8 neon 2019-11-14 Christoph