On 20 January 2014 17:21, Alex Velenko wrote:
> Could someone, please, commit it, as I do not have commit rights
>
> Alex
I've committed this for you.
/Marcus
On 17/01/14 14:39, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 17/01/14 14:22, Alex Velenko wrote:
Hi,
Here are some more improvements on changelog entry:
gcc/testsuite/
2013-01-16 Alex Velenko
* gcc.target/aarch64/vneg_f.c (STORE_INST): New macro.
(RUN_TEST): Use new macro.
(INDEX6
On 17/01/14 14:22, Alex Velenko wrote:
> Hi,
> Here are some more improvements on changelog entry:
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> 2013-01-16 Alex Velenko
>
> * gcc.target/aarch64/vneg_f.c (STORE_INST): New macro.
> (RUN_TEST): Use new macro.
> (INDEX64_32): Delete.
> (INDEX64_
Hi,
Here are some more improvements on changelog entry:
gcc/testsuite/
2013-01-16 Alex Velenko
* gcc.target/aarch64/vneg_f.c (STORE_INST): New macro.
(RUN_TEST): Use new macro.
(INDEX64_32): Delete.
(INDEX64_64): Likewise.
(INDEX128_32): Likewise.
Hi,
I agree the correct changelog entry should be:
gcc/testsuite/
2013-01-16 Alex Velenko
*/gcc.target/aarch64/vneg_f.c (STORE_INST): New macro.
(RUN_TEST): Use new macro.
(INDEX): marcro removed
(test_vneg_f32): Use fixed RUN_TEST.
(test_vneg_f64): Likewise.
On 16/01/14 12:23, Alex Velenko wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch fixes testcase vneg_f.c which was using an inconsistent
> vector model causing problems for Big-Endian compiler.
>
> Now testcase runs on both LE and BE without regressions.
>
> Is it okay?
>
> Kind regards,
> Alex Velenko
>
> gcc/tests
Hi,
This patch fixes testcase vneg_f.c which was using an inconsistent
vector model causing problems for Big-Endian compiler.
Now testcase runs on both LE and BE without regressions.
Is it okay?
Kind regards,
Alex Velenko
gcc/testsuite/
2013-01-16 Alex Velenko
*/gcc.target/aar
