Re: [Patch,testsuite] ad PR52641: More fixes for not-so-common targets

2012-11-26 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > >> Here are some more fixes for 16-bit int and similar. > > > >>* gcc.c-torture/execute/20120919-1.x: New file (int32plus). > > > > No, you should be able to use dg-direct

Re: [Patch,testsuite] ad PR52641: More fixes for not-so-common targets

2012-11-26 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: >> Here are some more fixes for 16-bit int and similar. > >> * gcc.c-torture/execute/20120919-1.x: New file (int32plus). > > No, you should be able to use dg-directives in the main file these days. > (The .x files are o

Re: [Patch,testsuite] ad PR52641: More fixes for not-so-common targets

2012-11-24 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Here are some more fixes for 16-bit int and similar. > * gcc.c-torture/execute/20120919-1.x: New file (int32plus). No, you should be able to use dg-directives in the main file these days. (The .x files are obsolete since a few years, IIRC.) br

[Patch,testsuite] ad PR52641: More fixes for not-so-common targets

2012-11-23 Thread Georg-Johann Lay
Here are some more fixes for 16-bit int and similar. Ok for trunk? Johann * gcc.dg/c1x-align-4.c: Skip avr. * gcc.dg/54455.c: Require scheduling. * gcc.dg/pr44024.c: Skip avr in final scan. PR testsuite/52641 * gcc.c-torture/execute/20120919-1.x: New file