Weddington, Eric wrote:
>> -Original Message- From: Georg-Johann Lay Sent: Friday, February
>> 08, 2013 9:00 AM To: Weddington, Eric Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Denis
>> Chertykov; Joerg Wunsch Subject: Re: [Patch,avr] Implement PR56254
>>
>> Weddington,
> -Original Message-
> From: Georg-Johann Lay
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 9:00 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Denis Chertykov; Joerg Wunsch
> Subject: Re: [Patch,avr] Implement PR56254
>
> Weddington, Eric wrote:
>
> >
&
Weddington, Eric wrote:
> From: Georg-Johann Lay
>> This adds variable delays to __builtin_avr_delay_cycles.
>>
>> Is this okay?
>
> What does this do? How does it work?
>
> Could you explain the statement in the documentation "if ticks is not a
> compile-time constant, the delay might be overe
> -Original Message-
> From: Georg-Johann Lay
> Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 5:53 AM
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Denis Chertykov; Weddington, Eric
> Subject: [Patch,avr] Implement PR56254
>
> This adds variable delays to __builtin_avr_delay_c
This adds variable delays to __builtin_avr_delay_cycles.
Is this okay?
Johann
gcc/
PR target/56254
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_expand_builtin) :
Expand to delay_cycles for non-const delays.
* config/avr/avr.md (delay_cycles): New expander.
(*delay_cycles.libgc
