Re: [Patch, testuite, committed] Fix some more tests that fail for non 32-bit int targets

2016-07-26 Thread Mike Stump
On Jul 26, 2016, at 1:08 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote: > Is the below patch ok? Ok. Thanks. Such changes are trivial, usual and customary.

Re: [Patch, testuite, committed] Fix some more tests that fail for non 32-bit int targets

2016-07-26 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
Mike Stump writes: > On Jul 25, 2016, at 5:00 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj > wrote: >> >> The below patch fixes tests that fail for the avr target, because they >> assume ints are atleast 32 bits wide and pointers and longs have the >> same size. >> >> I've required int32plus support for on

Re: [Patch, testuite, committed] Fix some more tests that fail for non 32-bit int targets

2016-07-25 Thread Mike Stump
On Jul 25, 2016, at 5:00 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote: > > The below patch fixes tests that fail for the avr target, because they > assume ints are atleast 32 bits wide and pointers and longs have the > same size. > > I've required int32plus support for one test, and for the other two,

[Patch, testuite, committed] Fix some more tests that fail for non 32-bit int targets

2016-07-25 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
Hi, The below patch fixes tests that fail for the avr target, because they assume ints are atleast 32 bits wide and pointers and longs have the same size. I've required int32plus support for one test, and for the other two, I've introduced a cast to intptr_t to avoid the pointer <-> int