On Feb 22, 2016, at 11:52 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
wrote:
>
> Yes that works
Ok.
Committed revision 233621.
Scream if anything goes wrong. Thanks for testing.
Mike Stump writes:
> On Feb 22, 2016, at 12:41 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
> wrote:
>> Could someone commit it for me please? I don't have commit access.
>
> Could you test out:
>
> Index: sso.exp
> ===
> --- sso.exp (revision 233
On Feb 5, 2016, at 1:03 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> You probably need to tweak the regexps again to make it accept the ^M.
So, it turned out to the the last line of the file and prune. I’ve fixed it by
merely adding an extra line to the end, so that the regexps work as expected.
Committed revis
On Feb 22, 2016, at 12:41 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
wrote:
> Could someone commit it for me please? I don't have commit access.
Could you test out:
Index: sso.exp
===
--- sso.exp (revision 233611)
+++ sso.exp (working copy
Mike Stump okayed the patch
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00321.html).
Could someone commit it for me please? I don't have commit access.
Regards
Senthil
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes:
> Hi,
>
> When running the regression testsuite for the AVR target, I noticed a
> bunch
> 2016-02-04 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
>
> * gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sso/p1.c: Add dg-require-effective-target int32.
> * gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sso/p2.c: Likewise.
> * gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sso/p3.c: Likewise.
> * gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sso/p5.c: Likewise.
> * gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sso/p6.c: Lik
> Anyone have a sense of how this is supposed to work and what is wrong? The
> lines appear to be the same to me. :-(
You probably need to tweak the regexps again to make it accept the ^M.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Feb 4, 2016, at 5:46 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
wrote:
> When running the regression testsuite for the AVR target, I noticed a
> bunch of sso tests failing
> If this patch is ok, could someone commit please?
The patch is Ok.
I don’t recall a target supports for I/O. So, I/O is incredible
Hi,
When running the regression testsuite for the AVR target, I noticed a
bunch of sso tests failing - turns out they assume sizeof(int) == 4.
This patch marks them UNSUPPORTED for targets that don't match that
assumption, by requiring effective-target int32.
A few tests still run and
