Re: [Patch, testsuite, mips] Fix two failing MIPS tests.

2014-05-05 Thread Richard Sandiford
Steve Ellcey writes: > On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 07:52 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > >> > Old: >> > >> >li $5,305397760# 0x1234 >> >addiu $4,$5,1 >> >addiu $5,$5,-1 >> > >> > New: >> > >> >li $5,305332224# 0x1233 >> >

Re: [Patch, testsuite, mips] Fix two failing MIPS tests.

2014-05-05 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 07:52 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Old: > > > > li $5,305397760# 0x1234 > > addiu $4,$5,1 > > addiu $5,$5,-1 > > > > New: > > > > li $5,305332224# 0x1233 > > ori $5,$5,0x > >

Re: [Patch, testsuite, mips] Fix two failing MIPS tests.

2014-05-05 Thread Steve Ellcey
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 07:52 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Old: > > > > li $5,305397760# 0x1234 > > addiu $4,$5,1 > > addiu $5,$5,-1 > > > > New: > > > > li $5,305332224# 0x1233 > > ori $5,$5,0x > >

Re: [Patch, testsuite, mips] Fix two failing MIPS tests.

2014-05-02 Thread Richard Sandiford
"Steve Ellcey " writes: > Two MIPS specific tests started failing a few days ago, this patch fixes > them. The tests are trying to check that a performance optimization is > done and that one constant is derived from another and not simply loaded > as a completely new constant. > > Post 4.9 chang

[Patch, testsuite, mips] Fix two failing MIPS tests.

2014-05-02 Thread Steve Ellcey
Two MIPS specific tests started failing a few days ago, this patch fixes them. The tests are trying to check that a performance optimization is done and that one constant is derived from another and not simply loaded as a completely new constant. Post 4.9 changes have affected which constant get