Re: [Patch, libstdc++/64140] Fix unmatched prefix in regex

2014-12-04 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 03/12/14 20:34 -0800, Tim Shen wrote: Committed. Does it need to be backported to 4.9? When do we usually do the backporting? It depends. If the patch is a bit risky sometimes we'll leave it on the trunk for a while before backporting in case any problems arise. I think this change is safe

Re: [Patch, libstdc++/64140] Fix unmatched prefix in regex

2014-12-03 Thread Tim Shen
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > OK - thanks. Committed. Does it need to be backported to 4.9? When do we usually do the backporting? -- Regards, Tim Shen

Re: [Patch, libstdc++/64140] Fix unmatched prefix in regex

2014-12-03 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 03/12/14 09:41 -0800, Tim Shen wrote: Bootstrapped and tested. Thanks! OK - thanks.

[Patch, libstdc++/64140] Fix unmatched prefix in regex

2014-12-03 Thread Tim Shen
Bootstrapped and tested. Thanks! -- Regards, Tim Shen commit 942a5f8e5f4fc4af4f1a18f15b529166e9bdd3ac Author: timshen Date: Wed Dec 3 09:36:04 2014 -0800 PR libstdc++/64140 * include/bits/regex.tcc (regex_iterator<>::operator++): Update prefix.matched after modifying