On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 4:59 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:21 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
As suggested by Joseph, it uses fegetround instead of trying to get the
inform
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:38 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:21 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>> As suggested by Joseph, it uses fegetround instead of trying to get the
>>> information elsewhere (which glibc does to avoid mixing libm
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:21 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>> As suggested by Joseph, it uses fegetround instead of trying to get the
>> information elsewhere (which glibc does to avoid mixing libm with libc).
>>
>> Build and tested on x86-64-gnu-linux
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> As suggested by Joseph, it uses fegetround instead of trying to get the
> information elsewhere (which glibc does to avoid mixing libm with libc).
>
> Build and tested on x86-64-gnu-linux. Committed as Rev. 193770.
>
> Tobias
This caused:
h
