Mikael Morin wrote:
This is not a bug nor a regression, so this should normally wait for the next
stage1. It is obvious on the other hand, and safe, as the 'n< loop->dimen'
conditions are inside a 'for (n = 0; n< loop->dimen; n++)' loop.
Regression tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (with the
Hello,
This change
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=179689
removed references to gfc_loopinfo's codimen field and one conditional
checking against gfc_loopinfo::dimen (as we had the convention that dimensions
above dimen were codimensions).
I have noticed two more of those condi
