Re: [Patch, fortran] PR91926 - assumed rank optional

2019-10-25 Thread Tobias Burnus
On 10/21/19 7:28 PM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: Please find attached a patch to keep 9-branch up to speed with trunk as far as the ISO_Fortran_binding feature is concerned. It bootstraps and regtests on 9-branch and incorporates the correction for PR92027, which caused problems for trunk on cert

[Patch, fortran] PR91926 - assumed rank optional

2019-10-21 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Please find attached a patch to keep 9-branch up to speed with trunk as far as the ISO_Fortran_binding feature is concerned. It bootstraps and regtests on 9-branch and incorporates the correction for PR92027, which caused problems for trunk on certain platforms. OK to commit? Paul 2019-10-21 P

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR91926 - assumed rank optional

2019-10-19 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Tobias, You are quite right to take me to task. As I wrote in the original message to the list, I was trying to respond rapidly before stepping out of the door on vacation. The original patch is attached. The fix to this problem is to revert that part in libgfortran/runtime/ISO_Fortran_binding.c.

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR91926 - assumed rank optional

2019-10-17 Thread Tobias Burnus
See also: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92027 for a tracking bug – I just added also some analysis. Tobias PS: A better patch submission, with the actual patch attached, would have been nice. Please re-post the committed patch – and the new patch, which fixes the fall out. – Tha

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR91926 - assumed rank optional

2019-10-09 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi Christophe, Thanks for flagging this up - I am back at base on Saturday and will take it up then. Regards Paul On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 at 11:13, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > Hi, > > > On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 20:31, Paul Richard Thomas > wrote: >> >> I must apologise not posting this before committ

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR91926 - assumed rank optional

2019-10-09 Thread Christophe Lyon
Hi, On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 20:31, Paul Richard Thomas < paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > I must apologise not posting this before committing. I left for a > vacation this morning and I thought that this problem and the one > posted by Gilles were best fixed before departing. The patch only

[Patch, fortran] PR91926 - assumed rank optional

2019-10-05 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
I must apologise not posting this before committing. I left for a vacation this morning and I thought that this problem and the one posted by Gilles were best fixed before departing. The patch only touches the new ISO_Fortran binding feature and so I thought that I would be safe to do this. It was