Re: *ping* Re: [Patch, fortran] PR66929 fix iso_varying_string ICE

2015-08-06 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi Mikael, This is fine for backporting. Thanks for doing this. Paul On 6 August 2015 at 12:09, Mikael Morin wrote: > Le 25/07/2015 20:33, Mikael Morin a écrit : >> >> Le 21/07/2015 23:10, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit : >>> >>> On 21 July 2015 at 14:53, Mikael Morin wrote: Hello, >>>

*ping* Re: [Patch, fortran] PR66929 fix iso_varying_string ICE

2015-08-06 Thread Mikael Morin
Le 25/07/2015 20:33, Mikael Morin a écrit : Le 21/07/2015 23:10, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit : On 21 July 2015 at 14:53, Mikael Morin wrote: Hello, The fix for PR61831 committed recently [1] introduced/uncovered a NULLL pointer dereference with iso_varying_string, because a generic symbol (wh

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR66929 fix iso_varying_string ICE

2015-07-25 Thread Mikael Morin
Le 21/07/2015 23:10, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit : Hi Mikael, This looks fine to me - OK for trunk. Thanks for the patch Paul On 21 July 2015 at 14:53, Mikael Morin wrote: Hello, The fix for PR61831 committed recently [1] introduced/uncovered a NULLL pointer dereference with iso_varying_st

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR66929 fix iso_varying_string ICE

2015-07-21 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Hi Mikael, This looks fine to me - OK for trunk. Thanks for the patch Paul On 21 July 2015 at 14:53, Mikael Morin wrote: > Hello, > > The fix for PR61831 committed recently [1] introduced/uncovered a NULLL > pointer dereference with iso_varying_string, because a generic symbol (which > has a N

[Patch, fortran] PR66929 fix iso_varying_string ICE

2015-07-21 Thread Mikael Morin
Hello, The fix for PR61831 committed recently [1] introduced/uncovered a NULLL pointer dereference with iso_varying_string, because a generic symbol (which has a NULL result) is used as procedure symbol, instead of the specific one. Fixed by using esym if it's available. Regression-tested on