Dear Mikael,
That looks to be OK for 4.8, 4.9 and 5.0.
Strange testcase, though... :-)
Thanks for the patch
Paul
On 15 February 2015 at 18:48, Mikael Morin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I propose a fix for PR60898, where a symbol is freed despite remaining
> reachable in the symbol tree.
> The problem
Le 15/02/2015 19:00, Jerry DeLisle a écrit :
> On 02/15/2015 09:48 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
>
>> [*] I have a few failing testcases (also without the patch), namely the
>> following; does this ring a bell ?
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_g0_7.f08
>> FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_en
Dear Mikael,
I have regstrapped revision r220715 with your patch. It fixes the tests in
PR60898 without regression.
> [*] I have a few failing testcases (also without the patch), namely the
> following; does this ring a bell ?
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_g0_7.f08
> FAIL:
On 02/15/2015 09:48 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
[*] I have a few failing testcases (also without the patch), namely the
following; does this ring a bell ?
FAIL: gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90
FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_g0_7.f08
FAIL: gfortran.dg/fmt_en.f90
FAIL: gfortran.dg/nan_7.f90
FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90
Hello,
I propose a fix for PR60898, where a symbol is freed despite remaining
reachable in the symbol tree.
The problem comes from this code in resolve_symbol:
>
> /* If we find that a flavorless symbol is an interface in one of the
>parent namespaces, find its symtree in this namespa
