Hi Paul,
no, I don't have an example in mind out of the box.
May be something like:
type :: T
character :: s(:)
character :: c
end type
class(T) :: foo(2)
But that is just a guess. I was triggered only by the first condition your
patch removes, where span was used instead of the of element
Hi Andre,
I don't think that's possible but I am prepared to be proven wrong :-) Do
you have an example in mind, where this might happen?
Regards
Paul
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 10:52, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> in principle the patch looks sound, but is the vptr_size always the sam
Hi Paul,
in principle the patch looks sound, but is the vptr_size always the same as a
descriptor->span? Can't the later be larger because of padding? If that is the
case, then the first `else if (UNLIMITED...` you removed in `gfc_get_array_span
()` would return a larger number.
Regards,
Hi All,
This was yet another regression that I caused, which was backported and so
I am rather anxious to fix it promptly.
The modifications that I made to gfc_get_array_span caused
unlimited polymorphic array components to be missed, when contained in a
dummy. Instead, the dummy was taken to be
