Re: [Patch, fortran] PR115700 - comment 5: uninitialized string length in ASSOCIATE

2024-10-30 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
You see, Jerry, it's the tmp4 that might have been or, perhaps, was and is no more :-) The comment will be changed. Thanks for the review. Paul On Wed, 30 Oct 2024 at 17:01, Jerry D wrote: > On 10/30/24 9:58 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:41:40PM +, Paul Richard Tho

[Patch, fortran] PR115700 - comment 5: uninitialized string length in ASSOCIATE

2024-10-30 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
This wrinkle to PR115700 came about because the associate-name string length was not being initialized, when an array selector had a substring reference with non-constant start or end. This, of course, caused subsequent references to fail. The ChangeLog provides an adequate explanation of the atta

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR115700 - comment 5: uninitialized string length in ASSOCIATE

2024-10-30 Thread Jerry D
On 10/30/24 9:58 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:41:40PM +, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: This wrinkle to PR115700 came about because the associate-name string length was not being initialized, when an array selector had a substring reference with non-constant start or end. Th

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR115700 - comment 5: uninitialized string length in ASSOCIATE

2024-10-30 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 04:41:40PM +, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > This wrinkle to PR115700 came about because the associate-name string > length was not being initialized, when an array selector had a substring > reference with non-constant start or end. This, of course, caused > subsequent re