On 05.07.2012 12:32, Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
Mikael,
After the previous fix, the test fails with
real*8 arr(4, 4, 4, 4)
1
Warning: Nonstandard type declaration REAL*8 at (1)
Replacing
real*8 arr(4, 4, 4, 4)
with
real(8) :: arr(4, 4, 4, 4)
fixes the failures (due to the compilatio
Mikael,
After the previous fix, the test fails with
real*8 arr(4, 4, 4, 4)
1
Warning: Nonstandard type declaration REAL*8 at (1)
Replacing
real*8 arr(4, 4, 4, 4)
with
real(8) :: arr(4, 4, 4, 4)
fixes the failures (due to the compilation with -pedantic-errors).
Dominique
Mikael,
There is a typo in your test gfortran.dg/inline_sum_4.f90:
"arr(1, :, :, =" should be "arr(1, :, :, :) =".
Thanks for the patch.
Dominique
Hello Mikael,
On 07/03/2012 09:56 PM, Mikael Morin wrote:
The patch below (which is the one posted on bugzilla) disables
reduction handling if subscript is true, so that the reductions are
handled from the outer call instead of from the subscript call.
I have finally convinced myself that it is
Hello,
Revision 180898:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=180898
introduced at the end of gfc_add_loop_ss_code some self recursive calls
to handle reductions' loops (like in sum for example).
However, as gfc_add_loop_ss_code already calls itself to handle scalar
and vector subsc
