Re: [Patch, fortran] PR 52428 Reading of large negative values and range checking

On 05/11/2012 09:07 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote: PING #2! On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote: PING On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote: Hi, currently when -frange-check is enabled, we check for overflow when doing a formatted read of an integer value

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR 52428 Reading of large negative values and range checking

PING #2! On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > PING > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Janne Blomqvist > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> currently when -frange-check is enabled, we check for overflow when >> doing a formatted read of an integer value. This check, however, is >> agains

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR 52428 Reading of large negative values and range checking

PING On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote: > Hi, > > currently when -frange-check is enabled, we check for overflow when > doing a formatted read of an integer value. This check, however, is > against the Fortran numerical model (see 13.4 in F2008), which defines > a symmetric

[Patch, fortran] PR 52428 Reading of large negative values and range checking

Hi, currently when -frange-check is enabled, we check for overflow when doing a formatted read of an integer value. This check, however, is against the Fortran numerical model (see 13.4 in F2008), which defines a symmetric interval [-huge(), huge()], whereas all targets gfortran supports use a two