Le 09/04/2013 20:33, Janne Blomqvist a écrit :
> Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, Ok for trunk?
>
Looks good. OK. Thanks.
> (IMHO the increase in compile time is modest enough that it's not
> worth doing the caching of uncompressed module files that I was
> previously thinking about, especi
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 09:18:46AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Apr 9, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Janne Blomqvist
> wrote:
> > the attached patch reduces the size of module files on disk
>
> Do those modules interoperate with C++ modules flawlessly? :-)
Fortran 2008 became an ISO well before C++'s l
On Apr 9, 2013, at 11:33 AM, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> the attached patch reduces the size of module files on disk
Do those modules interoperate with C++ modules flawlessly? :-)
Hi,
the attached patch reduces the size of module files on disk by
compressing them with zlib and storing them in the gzip format (RFC
1952). I chose zlib because it's a) ubiquitous and b) there's already
a copy of zlib in the GCC source tree, so this doesn't introduce any
further build
dependenci