Re: [Patch, fortran] Implement inquire(iolength= ) for DTIO

2016-10-16 Thread Dominique d'Humières
Forget it! It seems that I did not apply the patch!-( Sorry for the noise. Dominique > Le 16 oct. 2016 à 18:42, Dominique d'Humières a écrit : > > Dear Jerry, > >> The new test fails unless I replace 64 with 16 in 'if (rl.ne.64) call >> abort’. This seems consistent with your comment > > I

Re: [Patch, fortran] Implement inquire(iolength= ) for DTIO

2016-10-16 Thread Dominique d'Humières
Dear Jerry, > The new test fails unless I replace 64 with 16 in 'if (rl.ne.64) call abort’. > This seems consistent with your comment I have not been clear enough: I have to replace 64 with 16 even with your patch. Dominique

Re: [Patch, fortran] Implement inquire(iolength= ) for DTIO

2016-10-16 Thread Dominique d'Humières
Dear Jerry, The new test fails unless I replace 64 with 16 in 'if (rl.ne.64) call abort’. This seems consistent with your comment > The language seems a little obscure. I think the first sentence means > don't expect inquire to use a UDDTIO procedure and the second sentence > says when you use a

[Patch, fortran] Implement inquire(iolength= ) for DTIO

2016-10-15 Thread Jerry DeLisle
This very simple patch implements the subject feature. Fortran Standard draft F2016 states in 9.10.3.2: The output list in an INQUIRE statement shall not contain any derived-type list items that require a defined input/output procedure as described in subclause 9.6.3. If a derived-type list it