Re: [Patch, fortran] Bug fixes, including regressions, for the associate construct

2017-09-22 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear All, I seem to have messed up associate_31.f90 totally. Not only is it not doing the intended test but it is failing at all levels of optimization. I will remove it first thing tomorrow. Strangely, it did not fail when I regtested before committing. Sorry about this. Paul On 21 September

Re: [Patch, fortran] Bug fixes, including regressions, for the associate construct

2017-09-21 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
Dear Jerry, Thanks! Committed as revision 253077. Cheers Paul On 21 September 2017 at 01:52, Jerry DeLisle wrote: > On 09/20/2017 09:45 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: >> In the last update to the Parameterized Derived Types implementation, >> I fixed PR60483 as a side effect. I then checked al

Re: [Patch, fortran] Bug fixes, including regressions, for the associate construct

2017-09-20 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 09/20/2017 09:45 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote: > In the last update to the Parameterized Derived Types implementation, > I fixed PR60483 as a side effect. I then checked all the ASSOCIATE > bugs and noted that I was responsible for a number of regressions due > to a patch that I applied last ye

[Patch, fortran] Bug fixes, including regressions, for the associate construct

2017-09-20 Thread Paul Richard Thomas
In the last update to the Parameterized Derived Types implementation, I fixed PR60483 as a side effect. I then checked all the ASSOCIATE bugs and noted that I was responsible for a number of regressions due to a patch that I applied last year. I determined to fix them and found that I couldn't stop