Dear All,
I seem to have messed up associate_31.f90 totally. Not only is it not
doing the intended test but it is failing at all levels of
optimization. I will remove it first thing tomorrow. Strangely, it did
not fail when I regtested before committing.
Sorry about this.
Paul
On 21 September
Dear Jerry,
Thanks! Committed as revision 253077.
Cheers
Paul
On 21 September 2017 at 01:52, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> On 09/20/2017 09:45 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
>> In the last update to the Parameterized Derived Types implementation,
>> I fixed PR60483 as a side effect. I then checked al
On 09/20/2017 09:45 AM, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> In the last update to the Parameterized Derived Types implementation,
> I fixed PR60483 as a side effect. I then checked all the ASSOCIATE
> bugs and noted that I was responsible for a number of regressions due
> to a patch that I applied last ye
In the last update to the Parameterized Derived Types implementation,
I fixed PR60483 as a side effect. I then checked all the ASSOCIATE
bugs and noted that I was responsible for a number of regressions due
to a patch that I applied last year. I determined to fix them and
found that I couldn't stop