Commit revisions (was: Re: [Patch, fortran] [00/21] Remove coarray support in the scalarizer)

2011-10-07 Thread Mikael Morin
On Friday 30 September 2011 18:51:21 Steve Kargl wrote: > Mikael, > > I've finally made it through the set of patches, > and did not find anything that raised a red flag. > I'll note that I did not study the issue/question > you raised with patch 6. Tobias is probably the > best person to offer a

Re: [Patch, fortran] [00/21] Remove coarray support in the scalarizer

2011-09-30 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 01:08:13AM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: > > OK for trunk? > > Mikael > > patchset layout: > - patches 1..4: > Preliminary cleanups. > Those are quite independant on the rest. > Patch 4 is optional. > > - patches 5..13: > Step by step move from s

Re: [Patch, fortran] [00/21] Remove coarray support in the scalarizer

2011-09-22 Thread Steve Kargl
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 01:08:13AM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote: > Hello, > > the scalarizer is there to generate loops for assignments over more than > one element. Tobias extended it at various places to support coarrays, > but this should not be necessary as coarrays in assignments either refer >

[Patch, fortran] [00/21] Remove coarray support in the scalarizer

2011-09-15 Thread Mikael Morin
Hello, the scalarizer is there to generate loops for assignments over more than one element. Tobias extended it at various places to support coarrays, but this should not be necessary as coarrays in assignments either refer to the array present on the local image or to the one on the remote image