On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 12:18 +0100, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
> > > The recent patches on trunk to gfc_trans_allocate have fixed PR67933.
> > > I have added a testcase, which has been committed as revision 229452.
> >
> > This test case fails at runtime on powerpc64le-linux-gnu. …
> This should b
> > The recent patches on trunk to gfc_trans_allocate have fixed PR67933.
> > I have added a testcase, which has been committed as revision 229452.
>
> This test case fails at runtime on powerpc64le-linux-gnu. …
This should be fixed after revision r229503.
Dominique
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 19:07 +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> The recent patches on trunk to gfc_trans_allocate have fixed PR67933.
> I have added a testcase, which has been committed as revision 229452.
This test case fails at runtime on powerpc64le-linux-gnu. From
gfortran.log:
Oh bother! Thanks, Dominique
Paul
On 27 October 2015 at 19:24, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
> Dear Paul,
>
>> I have added a testcase, which has been committed as revision 229452.
>
> If I compile the test with -fsanitize=address,undefined I get at run time
>
> ==72440==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: g
Dear Paul,
> I have added a testcase, which has been committed as revision 229452.
If I compile the test with -fsanitize=address,undefined I get at run time
==72440==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: global-buffer-overflow on address
0x00010adfee20 at pc 0x00010adf913d bp 0x7fff54e0a270 sp 0x7fff54e0a26
Dear All,
The recent patches on trunk to gfc_trans_allocate have fixed PR67933.
I have added a testcase, which has been committed as revision 229452.
Since this is a 4.9/5 regression, I will extract the minimum change
necessary and will submit it as soon as I have regtested.
Cheers
Paul
2015-0
