*PING* http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-09/msg00031.html
(Additional early ping for:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-09/msg00039.html )
On September 16, 2013 22:18, Tobias Burnus wrote:
I forgot, again, to attach the patch.
However, to my surprise the email made it through. Contrary to
Janus Weil wrote:
(The same problem I had yesterday: Three emails didn't make it.)
Any idea what's the reason for this?
No idea. Usually, one gets a bounce message but this time one didn't.
Thus, I have no possibility to debug this from my side. #overseers
didn't see it as their business and
> Contrary to Janus' second
> patch review of today which didn't went past GCC's mail server.
Huh, indeed. I hadn't noticed ...
> (The same
> problem I had yesterday: Three emails didn't make it.)
Any idea what's the reason for this?
Cheers,
Janus
I forgot, again, to attach the patch.
However, to my surprise the email made it through. Contrary to Janus'
second patch review of today which didn't went past GCC's mail server.
(The same problem I had yesterday: Three emails didn't make it.)
Tobias Burnus wrote:
There were two related issue
There were two related issues with the _vtab of CLASS(*): First, it was
crashing in the generation of the finalization wrapper. Secondly, one
needs to ensure that the _vtab contains a NULL pointer for _final.
Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
OK for the trunk?
Tobias
