Re: *PING* Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR57697/58469 - Fix another defined-assignment issue

2013-09-25 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Tobias, > * PING * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-09/msg00039.html > > Additionally pinging for: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-09/msg00031.html Both are OK. Thanks a lot for the patches! Thomas

*PING* Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR57697/58469 - Fix another defined-assignment issue

2013-09-25 Thread Tobias Burnus
* PING * http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-09/msg00039.html Additionally pinging for: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-09/msg00031.html On September 19, 2013 21:11, Tobias Burnus wrote: This patch fixes two issues: a) It could happen that no code change has happened. In that case, the o

[Patch, Fortran] PR57697/58469 - Fix another defined-assignment issue

2013-09-19 Thread Tobias Burnus
This patch fixes two issues: a) It could happen that no code change has happened. In that case, the one freed an expression which still should be used. b) In my previous patch, I used a pointer assignment to the temporary of the LHS (after its allocation) [only if the LHS was initially unass