Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 55692: ICE on incorrect use of ASSOCIATED function

2012-12-28 Thread Janus Weil
>> here is a close-to-obvious patch for an ICE-on-invalid problem with >> ASSOCIATED: The relevant checks to catch the error were already there, >> but were not reached due to a gcc_assert(0) appearing earlier. The >> patch basically just removes the gcc_assert. >> >> Regtested on x86_64-unknown-li

Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 55692: ICE on incorrect use of ASSOCIATED function

2012-12-28 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi Janus, Janus Weil wrote: here is a close-to-obvious patch for an ICE-on-invalid problem with ASSOCIATED: The relevant checks to catch the error were already there, but were not reached due to a gcc_assert(0) appearing earlier. The patch basically just removes the gcc_assert. Regtested on x86

[Patch, Fortran] PR 55692: ICE on incorrect use of ASSOCIATED function

2012-12-28 Thread Janus Weil
Hi all, here is a close-to-obvious patch for an ICE-on-invalid problem with ASSOCIATED: The relevant checks to catch the error were already there, but were not reached due to a gcc_assert(0) appearing earlier. The patch basically just removes the gcc_assert. Regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.