On Wednesday 24 August 2011 15:31:17 Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > Isn't there some rules about backporting? The way we do it now, it
> > looks completely arbitrary.
>
> I think it *is* arbitrary - and unavoidable so.
>
> The main idea behind regression fixing is to make sure that what once
> worked s
On 08/24/2011 12:12 PM, Mikael Morin wrote:
On Tuesday 23 August 2011 14:26:59 Tobias Burnus wrote:
OK for the trunk?
OK.
Thanks for the review! Committed to the 4.7 trunk (Rev. 178038); I will
backport the patch later. (For cross-readers: That's a patch for a 4.3+
ice-on-invalid-code regre
On Tuesday 23 August 2011 14:26:59 Tobias Burnus wrote:
> The bug is a regression: An error was printed with 4.1.x but since 4.3.x
> one gets an ICE. [No idea what GCC 4.2 does.] The solution is simply:
> Returning if there is a MATCH_ERROR.
>
> See PR (esp. comment 2) for a more detailed descript
The bug is a regression: An error was printed with 4.1.x but since 4.3.x
one gets an ICE. [No idea what GCC 4.2 does.] The solution is simply:
Returning if there is a MATCH_ERROR.
See PR (esp. comment 2) for a more detailed description:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50163#c0
Buil
