Re: [Patch, Fortran] IMPLICIT fixes

2014-10-09 Thread Steve Kargl
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:27:09PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote: > > this patch fixes Alan's issue with IMPLICIT followed by ";". I am not > sure whether using the _eos machinery is really needed ??? especially as > "!" seem to be already handled. > > Additionally, I missed the inner "[...]" for

[Patch, Fortran] IMPLICIT fixes

2014-10-09 Thread Tobias Burnus
Hi all, this patch fixes Alan's issue with IMPLICIT followed by ";". I am not sure whether using the _eos machinery is really needed – especially as "!" seem to be already handled. Additionally, I missed the inner "[...]" for the new: R563 implicit-stmt is IMPLICIT implicit-spec-list