Mikael Morin wrote:
On 15/09/2012 19:36, Tobias Burnus wrote:
As a pre-script: Will you look at Paul's revised assignment patch - or
should I do it?
I looked at it twice or so, and couldn't get the double temporary thing.
I'll get back to it.
Thanks!
Thanks for the analysis. Will you create
On 15/09/2012 19:36, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi Mikael,
>
> thanks for your comments.
>
> As a pre-script: Will you look at Paul's revised assignment patch - or
> should I do it?
I looked at it twice or so, and couldn't get the double temporary thing.
I'll get back to it.
> If you want to know th
Hi Mikael,
thanks for your comments.
As a pre-script: Will you look at Paul's revised assignment patch - or
should I do it?
Mikael Morin wrote:
[Out of bounds]
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/array.c b/gcc/fortran/array.c
index 44ec72e..1611c3b 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/array.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/ar
Argh! Paul OKed the patch already.
Here are my comments anyway.
On 15/09/2012 11:46, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> this patch fixes some of the warning showing up for gcc/fortran at
> http://scan.coverity.com/. Coverity sells static C/C++/C#/Java code
> analyzers and offer scanning to open
Dear Tobias,
> Build and regtested on x86-64-linux.
> OK for the trunk?
OK for trunk - thanks for the patch.
Cheers
Paul
Dear all,
this patch fixes some of the warning showing up for gcc/fortran at
http://scan.coverity.com/. Coverity sells static C/C++/C#/Java code
analyzers and offer scanning to open-source projects. The result looks
like
http://www.coverity.com/images/products/static-analysis/screenshot-1-lar
