> Can you confirm that the class_optional_1.f90 of the trunk works correctly?
Yes: I have regtested with
make -k check-gfortran RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=class_optional*
--target_board=unix'{-m32,-m64}'"
without failures.
The profile I have posted was for the former version of class_optional_2.f90.
Dominique,
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
The previous class_optional_2.f90 runs after your commit, but it takes
~168s (so it may have run with the previous patch also, but I was not
patient enough to see it).
Here, it takes (current version) < 2s to compile and 0.150s to run the
program. If I lo
Tobias,
The previous class_optional_2.f90 runs after your commit, but it takes
~168s (so it may have run with the previous patch also, but I was not
patient enough to see it). The culprits are given by the following
profile:
+ 100.0%, start, a.out
| + 100.0%, main, a.out
| | + 100.0%, MAIN__, a.o
Hi Tobias,
I did not yet appied you latest patch to gfortran, but I ran the new tests
with gfortran patched with the previous patch and both pass (manual
testing without option, but -fcoarray=single). Note that for
class_optional_1.f90, valgrind --leak-check=full gives
==45665== 4 bytes in 1 bloc
Hi Tobias,
>> + for (ref = e->ref; ref; ref = ref->next)
>> +{
>> + if (ref->type == REF_COMPONENT
>> + && ref->u.c.component->ts.type == BT_CLASS)
>> + class_ref = ref;
>> +
>> + if (ref->next == NULL)
>> + break;
>> +}
>>
>> ... I guess the last if statem
Hi Dominique,
Dominique Dhumieres wrote:
the test gfortran.dg/class_optional_1.f90 does not compile
...
but the code seems weird.
I concur – and believe that it is already covered by the other test
cases. Thus, I removed it.
The code gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 compiles, but
the ru
Hi Tobias,
> gfortran supports OPTIONAL since quite some time - also some more
> complicated cases involving ELEMENTAL or the new F2008 addition, but as
> testing showed, the support is still incomplete; especially with polymorphic
> arguments there were several bugs.
>
> Besides a simple absent a
Hi Tobias,
I have tested your patch, mostly the added test cases.
I think the test gfortran.dg/class_optional_2.f90 should be split:
it has too much tests lumped together. In addition
the test gfortran.dg/class_optional_1.f90 does not compile
because "symbol 'i' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type" (three
gfortran supports OPTIONAL since quite some time - also some more
complicated cases involving ELEMENTAL or the new F2008 addition, but as
testing showed, the support is still incomplete; especially with
polymorphic arguments there were several bugs.
Besides a simple absent argument, passing an
