Hi Tobias,
Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-04/msg00272.html
OK.
Also pending: use-associated NULL() at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-05/msg6.html
Also OK (obvious really ;-)
Thanks for the patches!
Thomas
Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-04/msg00272.html
Also pending: use-associated NULL() at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-05/msg6.html
Tobias Burnus wrote:
The issue was found by Reinhold Bader when testing the Fortran-Dev
branch (thanks!), but it also affects GCC 4.6 and later.
The issue was found by Reinhold Bader when testing the Fortran-Dev
branch (thanks!), but it also affects GCC 4.6 and later.
The patch is rather obvious: The segfault occured as tail->u.ar.start[i]
== NULL. An alternative is to could use "continue" instead of "break".
Build and regtested on x8
