Dear Tobias, dear all,
This patch and the documentation patch are OK for trunk.
Many thanks
Paul
On 6 August 2014 08:46, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> * PING * – of the patch with the obvious change mentioned by Alessandro
> (i.e. using "if(is_lock_type)")?
>
> Tobias
>
> On 1 August 2014 21:57, Ale
*PING**2
Tobias
PS: Now being back from vacation, I will try to review pending patches
this evening.
On 6 August 2014 08:46, Tobias Burnus wrote:
* PING * – of the patch with the obvious change mentioned by
Alessandro (i.e. using "if(is_lock_type)")?
Tobias
On 1 August 2014 21:57, Alessan
* PING * – of the patch with the obvious change mentioned by Alessandro
(i.e. using "if(is_lock_type)")?
Tobias
On 1 August 2014 21:57, Alessandro Fanfarillo wrote:
Hello,
I was implementing lock/unlock on the library side when I found a
possible problem in the patch:
if (is_lock_type == GFC
Hello,
I was implementing lock/unlock on the library side when I found a
possible problem in the patch:
if (is_lock_type == GFC_CAF_CRITICAL)
+reg_type = sym->attr.artificial ? GFC_CAF_CRITICAL : GFC_CAF_LOCK_STATIC;
+ else
+reg_type = GFC_CAF_COARRAY_STATIC;
the if statement cannot be
This patch implements -fcoarray=lib support for CRITICAL blocks and
includes some preparatory work for locking. In particular:
* Updated the documentation for locking/critical, minor cleanup. The
patch goes on top of the unreviewed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-07/msg00155.html
*
