> However, I forgot the [*] (or [3,*] or ...). Fortunately, you
> have spotted the sematically relevant typo!
>
;-)
Paul
Dear Paul,
thanks for the review. Regarding:
Paul Thomas wrote:
> Maybe I am being stupid but what is the call, in the
> testcase, to subroutine test for?
Well, it is supposed to test coarray decls in functions,
contained functions, and in not-referenced functions.
However, I forgot the [*] (
Dear Tobias,
This looks fine to me. It does the things that you described and is
well hidden behind the co-array associated conditions. Thus it is OK
for trunk.
Maybe I am being stupid but what is the call, in the testcase, to
subroutine test for?
Cheers
Paul
ping**0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-05/msg00176.html
Tobias Burnus wrote:
Instead of a ping, an updated patch. This one additionally supports
registering of nonallocatable coarrays also in MODULE and in BLOCK
plus a test case.
(Changes to gfc_generate_module_vars and gfc_process_blo
Instead of a ping, an updated patch. This one additionally supports
registering of nonallocatable coarrays also in MODULE and in BLOCK plus
a test case.
(Changes to gfc_generate_module_vars and gfc_process_block_locals and
cgraph call in generate_coarray_init; some functions were moved up in
The following applies to -fcoarray=lib; for -fcoarray=single there
should be no change.
The coarray communication library needs to know about the coarrays even
before the function containing them has been invoked. Thus, the coarrays
(of all translation units) need to be registered at start up.
