>>> Adding ! { dg-additional-options "-std=f2003" }
>>> doesn't work, because the test uses
>>> call abort
>
> I actually think we should get rid of such extensions in the
> testsuite, where possible. This particular one is used all over the
> place, but could be easily replaces by something like
2018-02-14 12:47 GMT+01:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:30:14PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:24:35PM +0100, Janus Weil wrote:
>> > as the subject line says, the attached patch rejects procedure
>> > pointers in COMMON blocks (which is forbidden in F08).
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 12:30:14PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:24:35PM +0100, Janus Weil wrote:
> > as the subject line says, the attached patch rejects procedure
> > pointers in COMMON blocks (which is forbidden in F08). Since it's
> > apparently legal in F03, I'm stil
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:24:35PM +0100, Janus Weil wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as the subject line says, the attached patch rejects procedure
> pointers in COMMON blocks (which is forbidden in F08). Since it's
> apparently legal in F03, I'm still accepting it with -std=f2003 and
> add that flag to a te
2018-02-13 20:55 GMT+01:00 Richard Biener :
> On February 13, 2018 8:14:33 PM GMT+01:00, Steve Kargl
> wrote:
>>On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:24:35PM +0100, Janus Weil wrote:
>>>
>>> As my last submission, this fixes fallout from
>>>
>>https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/comp.lang.for
On February 13, 2018 8:14:33 PM GMT+01:00, Steve Kargl
wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:24:35PM +0100, Janus Weil wrote:
>>
>> As my last submission, this fixes fallout from
>>
>https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/AIHRQ2kJv3c.
>> As the last one, it is a very s
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:24:35PM +0100, Janus Weil wrote:
>
> As my last submission, this fixes fallout from
> https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/comp.lang.fortran/AIHRQ2kJv3c.
> As the last one, it is a very simple fix for an accepts-invalid
> problem (which is not a regression)
Hi all,
as the subject line says, the attached patch rejects procedure
pointers in COMMON blocks (which is forbidden in F08). Since it's
apparently legal in F03, I'm still accepting it with -std=f2003 and
add that flag to a test case where this 'feature' is used. In another
one, I'm adding the err
