On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 08:26:49PM +0100, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> Hi Arno,
>
> On 5 Sep 2011, at 20:04, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>
>>> Darwin8 does not have _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN defined.
>>
>> Is Darwin8 still active/supported?
>
> it works - and I test from time to time.
> .. feedback from fink in the f
Hi Arno,
On 5 Sep 2011, at 20:04, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
Darwin8 does not have _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN defined.
Is Darwin8 still active/supported?
it works - and I test from time to time.
.. feedback from fink in the form of bug reports suggests that it is
still being used in the wild too.
> Darwin8 does not have _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN defined.
Is Darwin8 still active/supported?
> OK for trunk & 4.6?
Not as submitted, you haven't provided a suitable changelog for review.
Also, when you repost your patch, can you please send a single version of
the patch (either inline or as an atta
Darwin8 does not have _SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN defined.
OK for trunk & 4.6?
Iain
Index: gcc/ada/adaint.c
===
--- gcc/ada/adaint.c(revision 178554)
+++ gcc/ada/adaint.c(working copy)
@@ -2460,7 +2460,10 @@ __gnat_number_of_cpus (
