On 30/01/15 13:25, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:03:13AM +, Tejas Belagod wrote:
Hi,
This is an almost obvious patch to fix PR64231 as discovered by A. Pinksi
and as proposed by Jakub.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64231
Regressions happy. OK to commit?
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:03:13AM +, Tejas Belagod wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is an almost obvious patch to fix PR64231 as discovered by A. Pinksi
> and as proposed by Jakub.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64231
>
> Regressions happy. OK to commit?
This is ok for trunk. We
On 23/01/15 17:15, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:48:43AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jan 23, 2015, at 3:03 AM, Tejas Belagod wrote:
This is an almost obvious patch to fix PR64231 as discovered by A. Pinksi and
as proposed by Jakub.
Kinda crappy code. The macro to use here
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 08:48:43AM -0800, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2015, at 3:03 AM, Tejas Belagod wrote:
> > This is an almost obvious patch to fix PR64231 as discovered by A. Pinksi
> > and as proposed by Jakub.
>
> Kinda crappy code. The macro to use here should take the number of bits
On Jan 23, 2015, at 3:03 AM, Tejas Belagod wrote:
> This is an almost obvious patch to fix PR64231 as discovered by A. Pinksi and
> as proposed by Jakub.
Kinda crappy code. The macro to use here should take the number of bits as an
int, and wether the constant is signed or not.
FITS (x, 32,
Hi,
This is an almost obvious patch to fix PR64231 as discovered by A.
Pinksi and as proposed by Jakub.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64231
Regressions happy. OK to commit?
Thanks,
Tejas.
ChangeLog:
gcc/
2015-01-23 Tejas Belagod
Andrew Pinski
J
